ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Intraday Variations in Skin Indentation Resistance.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Physiological Characteristics of the Facial Skin in Ethnic Tibetan Population Living at High Altitudes].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInformation about the mechanical properties of skin and their changes with age and other conditions is important to help characterize skin physiology and pathological changes. One method to obtain this information is to measure the force required to indent the skin to a specified indentation depth (FORCE). This process measures the tissue's resistance to indentation or its compressibility and is related to the tissue's elastic modulus. Since such measurements are made in clinical and other settings at various times of day (TOD), it is useful to estimate the extent of intraday variations in FORCE that may be expected. This report focuses on this issue.
methodFORCE was self-measured on the volar forearm, 5 cm distal to the antecubital fossa, every two hours from 08:00 to 24:00 hours on two consecutive days by 12 medical students (six females and six males) who were trained in the measurement process using an indentation device (SkinFibroMeter). Variability in FORCE versus TOD was analyzed using the nonparametric Friedman test and differences between genders by the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Differences between the first day (day 1) and the second day (day 2) were tested at each TOD. The whole-body fat percentage (FAT%) and water percentage (H
resultsThe age and BMI of the combined group (mean ± SD) were 24.5 ± 1.5 years and 23.2 ± 3.3 kg/m
conclusionThe findings indicate no statistically significant variation in indentation force in females, males, or combined concerning the TOD of the measurement or differences between consecutive days at corresponding times. This suggests that whether such measurements are done in a research setting or within a clinic, they can be done at various TOD with minimal expected variation for a given subject. However, an extension of these findings to persons with skin conditions or ages not herein evaluated must await further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.