ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
The Value of Serial Measurement of Arterial Stiffness in Cardiovascular Disease.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Relevance and Potential Applications of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Role of Arterial Stiffness and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness on Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment.Cardiology and therapy · 2025Review
- Central Arterial Pressure Waveform Technology for Arterial Stiffness Assessment.The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2025Article
- Usefulness of Arterial Stiffness as an Integrated Marker of Cardiovascular Risk.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Article
- Superior aortic strain and ventriculoarterial coupling in older women are moderately correlated with Framingham 10-year risk.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Development of an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of aortic stiffness risk in health examination populations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Pulse Wave Velocity: Methodology, Clinical Applications, and Interplay with Heart Rate Variability.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinically assessing arterial stiffness is valuable because it aids in predicting future cardiovascular events. There are several methods for measuring arterial stiffness, including pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index, and pulse pressure. Numerous studies have shown that these indicators of arterial stiffness possess prognostic value for various patient groups as well as the general population. In cross-sectional studies, arterial stiffness was also linked to organ damage indices. However, most studies related to arterial stiffness have relied on a single measurement. Taking multiple serial measurements of arterial stiffness offers several advantages. Through repeated assessments, one can confirm the variability of arterial stiffness and observe changes over time, which is beneficial for understanding its pathophysiology. Such repeated measurements are also invaluable in evaluating the efficacy of interventions aimed at improving arterial stiffness. However, caution is needed, as there is no standardized method for measuring arterial stiffness. For instance, with PWV, the values can be influenced by numerous external factors. Therefore, the external conditions during the measurement must be noted. It's essential to recognize the pros and cons of repeated arterial stiffness measurements and integrate them effectively into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.