ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Effectiveness and Safety of Different Patch Materials for Supravalvar Aortic Stenosis (Middle-Term Outcomes).
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative outcomes of direct anastomosis versus patch repair in neonatal aortic arch reconstruction: Freedom from restenosis and reintervention.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To determine the effectiveness and safety of different patch materials in the treatment of pediatric patients with congenital supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS). Methods: 218 consecutive SVAS patients (age Results: The median age at operation was 43.5 months (IQR 24.0-73.0). Only three patients had patch-related adverse complications, and no difference existed among the three groups ( Conclusions: In pediatric patients, the safety of autologous pericardium patch is acceptable, along with lower rates of middle-term re-operation or restenosis. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn, number: ChiCTR2300067851.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.