Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077577›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Abelacimab in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: The Right Drug at the Right Time for the Right Purpose. A Comprehensive Review.

Agnese Maria Fioretti, Tiziana Leopizzi, Daniele La Forgia, Raffaele De Luca, Donato Oreste, Riccardo Inchingolo, Pietro Scicchitano, Stefano Oliva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Sex-specific Risks in Lung Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Focus on Female Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agnese Maria FiorettiCardio-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-1367
Tiziana LeopizziCardiology-Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale SS. Annunziata, 74121 Taranto, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-1427
Daniele La ForgiaDiagnostic Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-4523
Raffaele De LucaSurgical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9337-0769
Donato OresteDiagnostic Radiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8049-8325
Riccardo InchingoloInterventional Radiology Unit, Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-5936
Pietro ScicchitanoCardiology-Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale della Murgia "Fabio Perinei", Altamura, 70022 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-0053
Stefano OlivaCardio-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3200-2372

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a devastating complication of cancer that can significantly impact a patient's health and life. The incidence of CAT is approximately 20%, and 1 in 5 cancer patients will develop CAT annually. Indeed, CAT can promote pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, leading to increased morbidity and mortality that dramatically impact survival. CAT can also provoke delay or discontinuation of anticancer treatment, which may result in a lack of treatment efficacy and high costs for patients, institutions, and society. Current guidelines advocate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as the first-line anticoagulant option in CAT. Compared to low-molecular-weight-heparins (LMWHs), DOACs are advantageous in that they typically have an oral route of administration, do not require laboratory monitoring, and have a more predictable anticoagulant effect. However, in patients with thrombocytopenia, renal failure, or those receiving anticancer regimens with potential for drug-drug interactions, LMWH is still the mainstay of care. The main limitation of current anticoagulant agents is related to bleeding risk (BR), both for DOACs and LMWHs. Specifically, DOACs have been associated with high BR in gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers. In this challenging scenario, abelacimab, an anti-factor XI agent, could represent a viable option in the management of CAT due to its "hemostasis sparing" effect. The safe profile of abelacimab could be useful in patients with active malignancy and CAT, as long-term anticoagulant therapy is often required. Two ongoing international phase III trials (Aster and Magnolia) compare abelacimab with the standard of care (i.e., apixaban in patients with CAT and dalteparin in those with CAT and high BR, respectively). Abelacimab is a new and attractive anticoagulant for the management of CAT, especially in the insidious and critical scenario of active cancer patients with venous thromboembolism and high BR. The aim of this narrative review is to discuss the updated evidence on the performance of DOACs and LMWHs in the treatment of CAT and to focus on the potential role of abelacimab in CAT and its promising associated clinical trials.

Indexed as

abelacimabbleeding riskcancer-associated thrombosisfactor XI inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID39077577
PMCPMC11262452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.