Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077466›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Long-term toxicity and efficacy of FLASH radiotherapy in dogs with superficial malignant tumors.

Bolette W Gjaldbæk, Maja L Arendt, Elise Konradsson, Kristine Bastholm Jensen, Sven Å J Bäck, Per Munck Af Rosenschöld, Crister Ceberg, Kristoffer Petersson, Betina Børresen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bolette W GjaldbækDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Maja L ArendtDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Elise KonradssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kristine Bastholm JensenVeterinärhuset Öresund, Limhamn, Sweden.
Sven Å J BäckDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Per Munck Af RosenschöldDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Crister CebergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kristoffer PeterssonDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Betina BørresenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/X006611/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: FLASH radiotherapy (RT) has emerged as a promising modality, demonstrating both a normal tissue sparing effect and anticancer efficacy. We have previously reported on the safety and efficacy of single fraction FLASH RT in the treatment of oral tumors in canine cancer patients, showing tumor response but also a risk of radiation-induced severe late adverse effects (osteoradionecrosis) for doses ≥35 Gy. Accordingly, the objective in this study was to investigate if single fraction high dose FLASH RT is safe for treating non-oral tumors. Methods: Privately-owned dogs with superficial tumors or microscopic residual disease were included. Treatment was generally delivered as a single fraction of 15-35 Gy 10 MeV electron FLASH RT, although two dogs were re-irradiated at a later timepoint. Follow-up visits were conducted up to 12 months post-treatment to evaluate treatment efficiency and adverse effects. Results: Fourteen dogs with 16 tumors were included, of which nine tumors were treated for gross disease whilst seven tumors were treated post-surgery for microscopic residual disease. Four treatment sites treated with 35 Gy had ulceration post irradiation, which was graded as severe adverse effect. Only mild adverse effects were observed for the remaining treatment sites. None of the patients with microscopic disease experienced recurrence (0/7), and all patients with macroscopic disease showed either a complete (5/9) or a partial response (4/9). Five dogs were euthanized due to clinical disease progression. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that single fraction high dose FLASH RT is generally safe, with few severe adverse effects, particularly in areas less susceptible to radiation-induced damage. In addition, our study indicates that FLASH has anti-tumor efficacy in a clinical setting. No osteoradionecrosis was observed in this study, although other types of high-grade adverse effects including ulcer-formations were observed for the highest delivered dose (35 Gy). Overall, we conclude that osteoradionecrosis following single fraction, high dose FLASH does not appear to be a general problem for non-oral tumor locations. Also, as has been shown previously for oral tumors, 30 Gy appeared to be the maximum safe dose to deliver with single fraction FLASH RT.

Indexed as

canine cancerFLASHradiotherapyultra-high dose rateveterinary trial

Identifiers

PMID39077466
PMCPMC11284943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.