ArticleCurrent opinion in solid state & materials science2024
Advancing materials science through next-generation machine learning.
Article in Current opinion in solid state & materials science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Empowered New Materials: Discovery, Synthesis, Prediction to Validation.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Advancements in Liquid Dosage Formulations in the Pharmaceutical Industry.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Materials.Current opinion in solid state & materials science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For over a decade, machine learning (ML) models have been making strides in computer vision and natural language processing (NLP), demonstrating high proficiency in specialized tasks. The emergence of large-scale language and generative image models, such as ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion, has significantly broadened the accessibility and application scope of these technologies. Traditional predictive models are typically constrained to mapping input data to numerical values or predefined categories, limiting their usefulness beyond their designated tasks. In contrast, contemporary models employ representation learning and generative modeling, enabling them to extract and encode key insights from a wide variety of data sources and decode them to create novel responses for desired goals. They can interpret queries phrased in natural language to deduce the intended output. In parallel, the application of ML techniques in materials science has advanced considerably, particularly in areas like inverse design, material prediction, and atomic modeling. Despite these advancements, the current models are overly specialized, hindering their potential to supplant established industrial processes. Materials science, therefore, necessitates the creation of a comprehensive, versatile model capable of interpreting human-readable inputs, intuiting a wide range of possible search directions, and delivering precise solutions. To realize such a model, the field must adopt cutting-edge representation, generative, and foundation model techniques tailored to materials science. A pivotal component in this endeavor is the establishment of an extensive, centralized dataset encompassing a broad spectrum of research topics. This dataset could be assembled by crowdsourcing global research contributions and developing models to extract data from existing literature and represent them in a homogenous format. A massive dataset can be used to train a central model that learns the underlying physics of the target areas, which can then be connected to a variety of specialized downstream tasks. Ultimately, the envisioned model would empower users to intuitively pose queries for a wide array of desired outcomes. It would facilitate the search for existing data that closely matches the sought-after solutions and leverage its understanding of physics and material-behavior relationships to innovate new solutions when pre-existing ones fall short.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.