Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077421›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Clinical Outcome of FFR-Guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions: The HALE-BOPP Study.

Matteo Tebaldi, Francesco Gallo, Alessandra Scoccia, Alessandro Durante, Delio Tedeschi, Sebastiano Verdoliva, Bernardo Cortese, Ferruccio Bilotta, Stuart Watkins, Alfonso Ielasi and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03079739 (The Prospective Assessment of Long-term Outcome of Deferred Coronary Lesions Based on FFR Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03079739 completednot on this map

The Prospective Assessment of Long-term Outcome of Deferred Coronary Lesions Based on FFR Evaluation

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital of FerraraRan2017 to 2022Enrolled1,305ConditionsMyocardial IschemiaArmsfractional flow reserve
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Matteo TebaldiCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Francesco GalloCardiology Department, Ospedale dell'Angelo di Mestre, 30174 Venice, Italy.
Alessandra ScocciaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandro DuranteCardiology Department, Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia (BG), Italy.
Delio TedeschiCardiology Department, Istituto Clinico S. Anna, 25127 Brescia (BS), Italy.
Sebastiano VerdolivaCardiology Department, Clinica Montervergine, 83013 Mercogliano (AV), Italy.
Bernardo CorteseCardiology Department, Clinica San Carlo, 20037 Paderno Dugnano (MI), Italy.
Ferruccio BilottaCardiology Department, Ospedale Civile SS Annunziata, 07100 Sassari (SS), Italy.
Stuart WatkinsDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, West of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, G81 4DY Glasgow, UK.
Alfonso IelasiCardiology Department, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, 20149 Milano (MI), Italy.
Giuliano ValentiniCardiology Department, Ospedale San Filippo e Nicola, 67051 Avezzano (AQ), Italy.
Rita PavasiniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Matteo SerenelliCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Emanuele D'AnielloCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Marco ArenaCardiology Department, Ospedale S. Andrea, 19121 La Spezia, Italy.
Graziella PompeiCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Antonella ScalaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Ennio ScolloCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Federico GibiinoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Serena CaglioniCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Daniela MeleCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Andrea MarroneCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Simone BiscagliaCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Emanuele BarbatoCardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, 9300 Aalst, Belgium.
Gianluca CampoCardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Anna, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, questions around the efficacy and effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) have arisen in various clinical settings. Methods: The Clinical Outcome of FFR-guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions (HALE-BOPP) study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international prospective study enrolling patients who underwent FFR measurement on at least one vessel. In accordance with the decision-making workflow and treatment, the vessels were classified in three subgroups: (i) angio-revascularized, (ii) FFR-revascularized, (iii) FFR-deferred. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). The analysis was carried out at vessel- and patient-level. Results: 1305 patients with 2422 diseased vessels fulfilled the criteria for the present analysis. Wire-related pitfalls and transient adenosine-related side effects occurred in 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4%-1.4%) and 3.3% (95% CI: 2.5%-4.3%) of cases, respectively. In FFR-deferred vessels, the overall incidence rate of TVF was 0.024 (95% CI: 0.019-0.031) lesion/year. After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the occurrence of TVF was 6%, 7% and 11.7% in FFR-deferred, FFR-revascularized and angio-revascularized vessels, respectively. Compared to angio-revascularized vessels, FFR-guided vessels (both FFR-revascularized and FFR-deferred vessels) showed a lower TVF incidence rate lesion/year (0.029, 95% CI: 0.024-0.034 vs. 0.049, 95% CI: 0.040-0.061 respectively, Conclusions: In a large prospective observational study, an FFR-based strategy for the deferral of coronary lesions is a reliable and safe tool, associated with good outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03079739.

Indexed as

coronary revascularizationFFR-based deferralfractional flow reservetarget vessel failure

Identifiers

PMID39077421
PMCPMC11273154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.