Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077379›Full record

ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2022

Performance of ultrasound guidance for vacuum-assisted biopsy of breast microcalcifications without associated mass.

S Le Cam, Y Badachi, S Ayadi, O Lucidarme

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S Le CamParis University, APHP, Bicêtre hospital, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Y BadachiDepartment of General Radiology, GH La Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles-Foix, Paris, France.
S AyadiDepartment of General Radiology, GH La Pitié-Salpêtrière Charles-Foix, Paris, France.
O LucidarmeSorbonne University, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 75013 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•The accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies of suspicious microcalcifications without mass is similar, or even better than results published in literature with stereotactic-guided biopsies.•When the microcalcifications are visible on ultrasound, there is no loss of chance in performing the biopsy under ultrasound guidance rather than under stereotactic guidance.•US guidance allows access to difficult areas for stereotactic, increases the comfort of the patient, avoids compression and irradiation.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast microcalcificationsPercutaneous vacuum-assisted biopsyUltrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID39077379
PMCPMC11265181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.