ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review of Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced detection of coronary artery disease using a GAN-transformer model on plasma cytokine profiles.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- OCT-Guided Distal Left Main Bifurcation PCI: Mid-Term Outcomes From a Multicenter South-Asian Registry.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Observational
- Prognostic Value of the NAPLES Score and Serum Uric Acid in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Evidence from Time-Dependent ROC and Time-Varying Hazard Ratio Analyses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The predictive role of dyspnea in left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery involvement in patients with myocardial infarction: an analytical cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Aortic protrusion of left main coronary artery stent during percutaneous coronary intervention after redo mitral valve replacement: surgical removal and new stent implantation.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Article
- Review of Optical Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Clinical and angiographic profile of left main coronary artery disease in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a retrospective study.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- The Influence of the Presence of the Ramus Intermedius on Atherosclerosis Plaque Deposition in the Left Bifurcation Region in Low-Risk Individuals.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant left main coronary artery disease is a very high-risk subgroup of coronary artery disease that is a crucial indicator of heightened morbidity and mortality rates. Despite its clinical significance, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal management strategy for patients, particularly given its phenotypic variations. Existing evidence-based guidelines offer insights into revascularization options, yet questions remain regarding long-term prognoses and clinical outcomes when comparing percutaneous coronary intervention to coronary artery bypass grafting. This comprehensive review aims to provide an in-depth analysis of contemporary strategies for the diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of left main coronary artery disease. By synthesizing current literature and addressing the evolving landscape of revascularization modalities, this review seeks to contribute valuable insights for clinicians and researchers grappling with the complexities of managing left main coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.