ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Incorporation of the 2017 Classification of Periodontal Diseased Conditions: Part I (Diagnosis of Periodontitis Involving Data From 4,993 Patients).
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The new classification system for periodontal and peri-implant diseases mentioned a few key points, including (1) "clinical gingival health," which was defined for the first time, and (2) staging and grading system. Thus, the present study defines the practicability of using the current classification system in day-to-day practice. Aim The primary aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the new classification system for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and its application in routine dental practices. Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional retrospective, non-interventional study consisting of 4,993 patients who were under active periodontal therapy as well as supportive periodontal therapy. Results Among patients diagnosed with dental biofilm-induced gingivitis with no underlying risk factors, 1105 (73.3%) exhibited bleeding on probing and 897 (45%) showed supragingival or subgingival calculus. Among the stage II grade B periodontitis group, 488 (28.9%) showed beginning destructive periodontal disease and 197 (50.4%) showed established destructive periodontal disease. Conclusion The implementation of the new classification system in routine dental practice has been readily accepted by clinicians. Staging and grading system of classification helps in assessing the severity, extent, and progression of disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.