Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077255›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Monitoring and Outcomes of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit.

Peter B Kharduit, Kaustuv Dutta, Clarissa J Lyngdoh, Prithwis Bhattacharyya, Valarie Lyngdoh, Annie B Khyriem, Suriya K Devi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter B KharduitMicrobiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.
Kaustuv DuttaAnesthesiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.
Clarissa J LyngdohMicrobiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.
Prithwis BhattacharyyaAnesthesiology and Critical Care, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.
Valarie LyngdohClinical Microbiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.
Annie B KhyriemMicrobiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.
Suriya K DeviMicrobiology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Shillong, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are significant healthcare-associated infections that increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This study aims to analyze the frequency, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes of CLABSI in an adult intensive care unit. Methods We conducted a hospital-based, prospective surveillance study in the critical care unit of a tertiary care hospital. We included patients with a central line (CL) from admission until discharge or line removal. Data collection focused on patient demographics, comorbidities, CL insertion site, and CLABSI rates. The incidence of CLABSI was calculated per 1,000 CL-days, and statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test. Results Of the 169 patients enrolled, 123 episodes of bloodstream infections were recorded, 56 (45.5%) of which were CLABSIs. The organisms most frequently isolated were

Indexed as

central line-associated bloodstream infectiondevice utilization ratioinfection controlmultidrug-resistant organismssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID39077255
PMCPMC11284343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.