ArticleCureus2024
Culture of Cultures: A Small Step Towards Augmenting Diagnostic Stewardship.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratories with a well-established diagnostic stewardship program for culture and the antimicrobial susceptibility test (C-AST) play a key role in guiding clinicians to institute specific targeted therapy. Blood culture is one of the most critical investigations performed at a microbiology laboratory. Therefore, it is particularly important to develop a robust diagnostic stewardship model for the blood culture laboratory division. Aiming at this hypothesis, this hospital-based clinical audit carried out within the Department of General Medicine, centered on the critical domain of antimicrobial stewardship (AMSP). The audit's primary objective was to systematically evaluate prevailing practices and pinpoint areas necessitating refinement in the administration of antimicrobial agents. Employing a meticulous approach involving exhaustive data scrutiny and feedback mechanisms, the audit unearthed strategic opportunities to optimize prescription patterns, curtail unwarranted antimicrobial utilization, and fortify adherence to established guidelines. The subsequent execution of targeted interventions, encompassing educational initiatives and routine performance feedback, culminated in a noteworthy enhancement of antimicrobial prescribing practices. These outcomes unequivocally underscore the efficacy of the audit in cultivating a milieu of judicious antimicrobial utilization, thereby augmenting patient care and mitigating antibiotic resistance within the department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.