ArticleCureus2024
Management of Short Bowel Syndrome With Chronic Intestinal Failure: A Single-Center Experience in Portugal.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Outcomes on Home Parenteral Support for Patients with Benign Chronic Intestinal Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Chronic Intestinal Failure: Portuguese Overview and Future Perspectives.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionShort bowel syndrome with chronic intestinal failure (SBS/CIF) is the inability to maintain protein-energy, fluid, electrolyte, or micronutrient balance due to a short bowel. Although SBS/CIF is rare, its clinical management is complex, challenging, expensive, and time-consuming.
aimThis study aimed to analyze a single center's experience with SBS/CIF in adult patients treated with home parenteral nutrition (HPN). MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective single-center analysis of all 13 consecutive adult patients with SBS/CIF was included in an HPN program between January 1994 and August 2023.
resultsBetween 1992 and 2023, 13 patients were included in an HPN program. The primary underlying pathology was acute mesenteric ischemia. The median age of starting HPN was 44 years. Most were subjected to several surgeries of extensive intestinal resection with posterior intestinal reconstruction. Five of the 13 patients died while on HPN with a median duration of 42 months. The causes of death related to HPN were catheter sepsis, endocarditis with cardiac failure, or hepatic failure. One patient died due to underlying pathology: pelvic abscesses and bleeding related to radiotherapy. Eight patients remain alive, with a median time of HPN of 173 months. During the HPN support, the most frequent complications were venous catheter infection and venous territory thrombosis. None of the eight patients alive have hepatic failure. Two patients recently started teduglutide with good tolerance and need a reduction in HPN support. All eight patients have a satisfactory quality of life (parenteral support needs range between five and two nutrition bags per week). Conclusion: Home parenteral nutrition remains the gold standard of SBS/CIF treatment, although teduglutide may reduce HPN needs and complications and provide a better quality of life. Despite the small number of patients, the results shown in this study are not inferior to those in large-volume centers. The existence of the commitment and interest of professionals involved in SBS/CIF at Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Portugal, was a fundamental key to achieving those results. A multidisciplinary healthcare group for HPN support can be essential to ensuring these patients' survival and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.