Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077168›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022

Echocardiography in Anderson-Fabry Disease.

Rosa Lillo, Maurizio Pieroni, Antonia Camporeale, Michele Ciabatti, Antonella Lombardo, Massimo Massetti, Francesca Graziani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Right atrial strain in Anderson-Fabry disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosa LilloDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Maurizio PieroniCardiovascular Department, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy.
Antonia CamporealeMultimodality Cardiac Imaging Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milan, Italy.
Michele CiabattiCardiovascular Department, San Donato Hospital, 52100 Arezzo, Italy.
Antonella LombardoUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Massimo MassettiUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Francesca GrazianiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Echocardiography is the most common diagnostic tool to screen for Fabry cardiomyopathy as it is fast, non-invasive, low-cost, widely available, easily applicable and reproducible. Echocardiography is the first-line investigation, being useful in all the stages of the disease: (1) in gene-positive patients, to unveil signs of early cardiac involvement and allowing timely treatment; (2) in patients with overt cardiomyopathy to estimate the severity of cardiac involvement, the possible related complications, and the effect of treatment. Recently, advanced echocardiographic techniques, such as speckle tracking analysis, are offering new insights in the assessment of Fabry disease patients and in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathies with hypertrophic phenotype. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview on the cardiac structural and functional abnormalities described in Fabry disease by means of echocardiography.

Indexed as

cardiac imagingcardiomyopathyechocardiographyFabry diseaselysosomal storage disordersspeckle trackingtissue Doppler

Identifiers

PMID39077168
PMCPMC11274060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.