ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
New Diagnostic Approach to Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: The Padua Criteria.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report and literature review: immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myasthenia gravis and myocarditis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Lifetime cumulative activity burden is associated with symptomatic heart failure and arrhythmic risk in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a retrospective cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- The 2023 European Task Force Criteria for Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Historical Background and Review of Main Changes.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Imaging Features of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathies.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2024Article
- Evolving spectrum of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Implications for Sports Cardiology.Clinical cardiology · 2023Review
- Application of next generation sequencing in cardiology: current and future precision medicine implications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a rare heart muscle disease characterized by a progressive fibro-fatty myocardial replacement, ventricular arrhythmias, and increased risk of sudden cardiac death. The first diagnostic criteria were proposed by an International Task Force of experts in 1994 and revised in 2010. At that time, ACM was mainly considered a right ventricle disease, with left ventricle involvement only in the late stages. Since 2010, several pathological and clinical studies using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging have allowed to understand the phenotypic expression of the disease and to reach the current idea that ACM may affect both ventricles. Indeed, left ventricular involvement may parallel or exceed right ventricular involvement. The main limitations of the 2010 criteria included the poor sensitivity for left ventricular involvement and the lack of inclusion of tissue characterization by CMR. The 2020 International criteria (the Padua criteria) were developed to overcome these shortcomings. The most important innovations are the introduction of a set of criteria for identifying left ventricular variants and the use of CMR for tissue characterization. Moreover, criteria for right ventricular involvement were also updated taking into account new evidence. According to the number of criteria for right and/or left ventricular involvement, the 2020 Padua criteria allows diagnosing three ACM phenotypic variants: right-dominant, biventricular and left-dominant. This review discusses the evolving approach to diagnosis of ACM, from the 1994 International Criteria to the 2020 Padua criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.