ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2024
Phenotyping of Drought-Stressed Poplar Saplings Using Exemplar-Based Data Generation and Leaf-Level Structural Analysis.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Methods in Forest Biotechnology: Current Status and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Revealing hierarchical structure of leaf venations via diffusion-refined label-efficient segmentation: Dataset and method.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Research on Drought Stress Detection in the Seedling Stage of Yunnan Large-Leaf Tea Plants Based on Biomimetic Vision and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Technology.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Integrating 3D Canopy Reconstruction to Assess Photosynthetic and Carbon Sequestration Responses of Larch Plantations to Drought Stress.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Integrating sensor fusion with machine learning for comprehensive assessment of phenotypic traits and drought response in poplar species.Plant biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drought stress is one of the main threats to poplar plant growth and has a negative impact on plant yield. Currently, high-throughput plant phenotyping has been widely studied as a rapid and nondestructive tool for analyzing the growth status of plants, such as water and nutrient content. In this study, a combination of computer vision and deep learning was used for drought-stressed poplar sapling phenotyping. Four varieties of poplar saplings were cultivated, and 5 different irrigation treatments were applied. Color images of the plant samples were captured for analysis. Two tasks, including leaf posture calculation and drought stress identification, were conducted. First, instance segmentation was used to extract the regions of the leaf, petiole, and midvein. A dataset augmentation method was created for reducing manual annotation costs. The horizontal angles of the fitted lines of the petiole and midvein were calculated for leaf posture digitization. Second, multitask learning models were proposed for simultaneously determining the stress level and poplar variety. The mean absolute errors of the angle calculations were 10.7° and 8.2° for the petiole and midvein, respectively. Drought stress increased the horizontal angle of leaves. Moreover, using raw images as the input, the multitask MobileNet achieved the highest accuracy (99% for variety identification and 76% for stress level classification), outperforming widely used single-task deep learning models (stress level classification accuracies of <70% on the prediction dataset). The plant phenotyping methods presented in this study could be further used for drought-stress-resistant poplar plant screening and precise irrigation decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.