ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Prevalence of
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AutomatedMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: US Air Force service members seeking HIV care were screened for MG infection during the surveillance period (16 May 2016-16 March 2020). Baseline and repeat MG prevalence rates were estimated. An extended Cox proportional hazards regression model evaluated characteristics associated with repeat MG infection. MG-positive rectal samples were tested for macrolide or fluoroquinolone resistance. Results: Among 299 male patients from a total of 308 patients followed during the surveillance period, baseline prevalence of MG infection was 19.7% (n = 59); among the 101 patients who screened positive for MG at any time during the surveillance period, repeat MG was 35% (n = 36). Characteristics independently associated with increased risk of repeat infection were sexually transmitted infection history vs none (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.33; 95% CI, 1.26-4.31), a sexually transmitted infection coinfection vs no positive test result in the medical records (aHR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.78-9.49), and a new HIV diagnosis (<1 vs ≥1 year; aHR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.45-3.73). AMR in MG-positive rectal specimens was 88% (43/49) indicating macrolide resistance, 18% (10/56) quinolone resistance, and 18% (10/56) both. Conclusions: Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance mutations were common. Testing for co-occurring MG infection and AMR mutations may be warranted in guiding treatment for sexually transmitted infections such as chlamydia or gonorrhea detected at HIV diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.