Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077048›Full record

ReviewScience in One Health2023

A review on the use of machine learning techniques in monkeypox disease prediction.

Shailima Rampogu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science in One Health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Power of One Health: the first year ofScience in One Health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shailima RampoguCachet Big Data Lab, Hyderabad, 500045, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases have posed a global threat recently, progressing from endemic to pandemic. Early detection and finding a better cure are methods for curbing the disease and its transmission. Machine learning (ML) has demonstrated to be an ideal approach for early disease diagnosis. This review highlights the use of ML algorithms for monkeypox (MP). Various models, such as CNN, DL, NLP, Naïve Bayes, GRA-TLA, HMD, ARIMA, SEL, Regression analysis, and Twitter posts were built to extract useful information from the dataset. These findings show that detection, classification, forecasting, and sentiment analysis are primarily analyzed. Furthermore, this review will assist researchers in understanding the latest implementations of ML in MP and further progress in the field to discover potent therapeutics.

Indexed as

Machine learningMonkeypoxSentiment analysisSupervised learningUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39077048
PMCPMC11262284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.