Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077016›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Conduits and Strategies for Arterial Revascularization in CABG.

Talal Alzghari, Arnaldo Dimagli, Kevin R An, Gianmarco Cancelli, Lamia Harik, Roberto Perezgorvas-Olaria, Giovanni Jr Soletti, Mario Gaudino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Talal AlzghariDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Arnaldo DimagliDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Kevin R AnDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Gianmarco CancelliDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Lamia HarikDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Roberto Perezgorvas-OlariaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Giovanni Jr SolettiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Mario GaudinoDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Depending on the severity of the coronary artery disease, treatment options include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Although CABG has been performed since the 1970s, there is still debate onwhich conduit to use after the left internal thoracic artery. Currently, national registries report the left internal thoracic artery and the saphenous vein as the most commonly used conduits in CABG, while other arterial grafts, such as the radial artery, represent a minority, even though the current evidence suggests potential benefits of these arterial conduits. In this review, we aimed to describe the different types of arterial conduits used for CABG and summarize the evidence behind their use.

Indexed as

CABGcoronary artery bypass graftinginternal thoracic arterymultiple arterial graftingradial artery

Identifiers

PMID39077016
PMCPMC11266465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.