Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39077011›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Chronic Heart Failure Management: Monitoring Patients and Intercepting Exacerbations.

Gianfranco Piccirillo, Federica Moscucci, Susanna Sciomer, Damiano Magrì

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gianfranco PiccirilloDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche, Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza'' University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Federica MoscucciDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Susanna SciomerDipartimento di Scienze Cliniche, Internistiche, Anestesiologiche e Cardiovascolari, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza'' University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Damiano MagrìDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Molecolare, S. Andrea Hospital, "Sapienza'' University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant progress in the field of therapy and management, chronic heart failure (CHF) still remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality, especially among the elderly in Western countries. In particular, frequent episodes of decompensation and, consequently, repeated hospitalizations represent an unsustainable burden for national health systems and the cause of worsening quality of life. CHF is more prevalent in elderly women, who often have "peculiar" clinical characteristics and a more preserved ejection fraction caused by endothelial dysfunction and micro-vessel damage. At the moment, noninvasive technologies that are able to remotely monitor these patients are not widely available yet, and clinical trials are underway to evaluate invasive remote sensors. Unfortunately, implantable devices for identifying decompensation are not the most practical solution in the majority of of patients with chronic heart failure. In particular, they are hypothesized to have the possibility of monitoring patients by pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ventricular repolarization variability, and bioimpedance cardiography at the first point of care, but new technology and clinical trials must be planned to address the development and spread of these emergent possibilities.

Indexed as

bioimpedanceECG markersheart failureprognosisrepolarizationsex/gender peculiarities

Identifiers

PMID39077011
PMCPMC11266474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.