ArticleInternational journal of women's dermatology2024
Assessing the inclusion of women of color in lichen sclerosus treatment studies: a scoping review.
Article in International journal of women's dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International Expert Consensus on Defining Skin of Color and Delivering Equitable Dermatologic Care.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) is an underrecognized chronic inflammatory skin condition with significant clinical features and potential for malignant transformation. To date, there are no studies comparing the course of this disease in women of color to other racial groups. Objective: The objective of this study was to provide a scoping review examining racial demographic data in VLS treatment studies and specifically assessing for the inclusion of women of color. Methods: Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a primary literature search was conducted using 4 databases: Ovid Medline(R), Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science from all years to December 2022. We included published studies with adult women diagnosed with VLS and containing a treatment arm using topical corticosteroids. Single case reports, literature reviews, systemic reviews, meta-analyses, and reports not available in English were excluded. Results: Overall, 1340 nonduplicate studies were assessed for eligibility criteria. In total, 65 publications were included. Only 6 included racial demographic data. Black women made up at most 3.8% of the sample population and Latinx women made up at most 5.7%. Limitations: Our review focused on a specific intervention (ie, the use of topical corticosteroids for the treatment of VLS), which may restrict the generalizability of our findings to other interventions. No risk of bias assessment was done due to the scoping nature of the review. Conclusion: Women of color are underrepresented in studies of topical corticosteroid use in adult women with VLS. Intentional diversity in recruitment will enable the collection of data that is both more accurate and reflective of a broader spectrum of perspectives and life experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.