ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
Fibrinolytic Therapy in Purulent Pericarditis.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Difficult to treat purulent pericarditis - where does full sternotomy stand? A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- [Cutaneous-pericardial fistula and purulent pericarditis secondary to a complicated pericardiocentesis: Case report].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025Review
- Purulent Pericarditis: Treating a Medically-Complex Patient With Intrapericardial Antibiotics.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Plant-derived hydrogel and photosynthetic nano-units for myocardial infarction therapy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Case Report: Eccentric purulent pericarditis treated by PTCA guidewire-based pericardiocentesis and intrapericardial alteplase.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purulent pericarditis (PP) is rare disease, and if left untreated, it is associated with very high mortality, nearly 100%. A considerable clinical problem due to PP is a very high probability of developing constrictive pericarditis (CP). Pericardial drainage is essential in the treatment of PP and should be performed urgently. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is equally important. Unfortunately, fibrin deposits often create occulated spaces and reservoirs that reduce the penetration of antibiotics and their effectiveness. The rationale for the intrapericardial use of fibrinolytic drugs in PP is based on their ability to dissolve fibrin strands and collagen fibres, thus improving the penetration of antibiotics to the pericardial sac and lowering the risk of CP. The choice of the drug, as well as its dosage and the method of administration is still under debate. The authors of the article share their experiences and review current literature on this rare topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.