Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076850›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024

A surface registration-based approach for assessment of 3D angles in guided growth interventions in the growing femur.

Shima Gholinezhad, John Rasmussen, Ahmed Halloum, Søren Kold, Ole Rahbek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Effect of Rotational Guided Growth With Flexible Tethers on the Distal Femoral Bone: An Experimental Study in a Porcine Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  2. A novel plate design for rotational guided growth: An experimental study in immature porcine femurs.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shima GholinezhadDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0364-8844
John RasmussenDepartment of Materials and Production Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3257-5653
Ahmed HalloumDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark.ORCID 0009-0008-4867-3219
Søren KoldDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3387-1473
Ole RahbekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5602-4533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative assessment of surgical interventions for correcting femoral rotational deformities necessitates a comparative analysis of femoral rotation pre- and post-surgery. While 2D assessment methods are commonly employed, ongoing debate surrounds their accuracy and reliability. To address the limitations associated with 2D analysis, we introduced and validated a 3D model-based analysis method for quantifying the angular and rotational impact of corrective rotational osteotomy in the growing femur. Methods: The method is based on surface registration of the pre- and post-intervention 3D femoral models. To this end, 3D triangulated surface models were generated using CT images for the right femurs of 11 skeletally immature pigs, each scanned at two distinct time points with a 12-week interval between scans. In our validation procedures, femoral corrective rotational osteotomy of the post-12-week femur was simulated at varying angles of 5, 10, 15 and 20 degrees in three dimensions. Subsequently, a surface 3D/3D registration-based approach was applied to determine the 3D femoral angulation and rotation between the two models to assess the method's detection accuracy of the predefined twist angles as ground truth references. Results: The results document the precision and accuracy of the registration-based method in evaluating rotation angles. Consistently high accuracy was observed across all angles, with an accuracy rate of 92.97% and a coefficient of variance of 8.14%. Conclusion: This study has showcased the potential for improving post-operative assessments with significant implications for experimental studies evaluating the effects of correcting rotational deformities in the growing femur. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Indexed as

3D imagingfemoral rotationguided growthpostoperative assessment

Identifiers

PMID39076850
PMCPMC11284963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.