ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
A complex network approach to analyse pre-trained language models for ancient Chinese.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large language models linking traditional Chinese medicine knowledge and clinical practice.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ancient Chinese is a splendid treasure within Chinese culture. To facilitate its compilation, pre-trained language models for ancient Chinese are developed. After that, researchers are actively exploring the factors contributing to their success. However, previous work did not study how language models organized the elements of ancient Chinese from a holistic perspective. Hence, we adopt complex networks to explore how language models organize the elements in ancient Chinese system. Specifically, we first analyse the characters' and words' co-occurrence networks in ancient Chinese. Then, we study characters' and words' attention networks, generated by attention heads within SikuBERT from two aspects: static and dynamic network analysis. In the static network analysis, we find that (i) most of attention networks exhibit small-world properties and scale-free behaviour, (ii) over 80% of attention networks exhibit high similarity with the corresponding co-occurrence networks, (iii) there exists a noticeable gap between characters' and words' attention networks across layers, while their fluctuations remain relatively consistent, and (iv) the attention networks generated by SikuBERT tend to be sparser compared with those from Chinese BERT. In dynamic network analysis, we find that the sentence segmentation task does not significantly affect network metrics, while the part-of-speech tagging task makes attention networks sparser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.