Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076808›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Opening science to society: how to progress societal engagement into (open) science policies.

U Wehn, R Ajates, C Mandeville, L Somerwill, G Kragh, M Haklay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Citizen science powers wetland restoration.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

U WehnIHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7 Delft 2601DA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1420-9721
R AjatesRaquel: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Calle Obispo Trejo, n°2, Madrid 28040, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-8784
C MandevilleCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 1, Trondheim 7034, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1361-607X
L SomerwillIHE Delft Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7 Delft 2601DA, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-6581
G KraghCentre for Science Studies, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 118, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1792-2098
M HaklayDepartment of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6117-3026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A broad understanding of the aims and objectives of the international open science movement was recently adopted with the 2021 UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science, expanding the focus of open science to include scientific knowledge, infrastructures, knowledge systems and the open engagement of societal actors. In response, recent discussions on science policy practice are shifting to the implementation of open science via national policies. While policy instruments to support some aspects of open science are well-studied, guidance on the emerging 'social' aspects of open science has lagged, prompting UNESCO to generate guidance. In this paper, several authors of the UNESCO Open Science Toolkit guidance document on 'Engaging societal actors in Open Science' synthesize the scholarly underpinnings behind its recommendations. This work draws upon a targeted search from academic, policy, and grey literature in the fields of open science and community engagement, with a special focus on citizen science, to derive guidance on how to overcome barriers to the uptake of societal engagement approaches. The results present building blocks of what an enabling environment for the open engagement of societal actors could look like, identifying key considerations and reflecting on opportunities and challenges for progressing and evaluating sound open engagement of societal actors into regional & national (open) science policies.

Indexed as

citizen scienceopen accessopen dataopen sciencepolicy recommendationssocietal engagement

Identifiers

PMID39076808
PMCPMC11285865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.