ArticleRoyal Society open science2024
Epileptic seizure detection using CHB-MIT dataset: The overlooked perspectives.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of artificial intelligence technology in epilepsy.Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Patient-independent hybrid generative-discriminative modeling for seizure detection in long-term scalp EEG.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unlocking Insights from Postictal EEGs: Investigating Predictive Markers of Seizure Recurrence.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Efficient and Accurate Epilepsy Seizure Prediction and Detection Based on Multi-Teacher Knowledge Distillation RGF-Model.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Hilbert-domain sub-band feature framework for EEG-based seizure detection.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- An Innovative Method for Refractory Epilepsy Diagnosis Based on Microstate Analysis and Graph Convolutional Network.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Domain-generalized Deep Learning for Improved Subject-independent Emotion Recognition Based on Electroencephalography.Experimental neurobiology · 2025Article
- Personalizing Seizure Detection for Individual Patients by Optimal Selection of EEG Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Combining meta and ensemble learning to classify EEG for seizure detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- EPIC-NET: EEG-based epilepsy classification and brain localization using Optuna wave-gated recurrent unit network.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Epileptic seizure detection using CHB-MIT dataset: The overlooked perspectives.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is a life-threatening neurological condition. Manual detection of epileptic seizures (ES) is laborious and burdensome. Machine learning techniques applied to electroencephalography (EEG) signals are widely used for automatic seizure detection. Some key factors are worth considering for the real-world applicability of such systems: (i) continuous EEG data typically has a higher class imbalance; (ii) higher variability across subjects is present in physiological signals such as EEG; and (iii) seizure event detection is more practical than random segment detection. Most prior studies failed to address these crucial factors altogether for seizure detection. In this study, we intend to investigate a generalized cross-subject seizure event detection system using the continuous EEG signals from the CHB-MIT dataset that considers all these overlooked aspects. A 5-second non-overlapping window is used to extract 92 features from 22 EEG channels; however, the most significant 32 features from each channel are used in experimentation. Seizure classification is done using a Random Forest (RF) classifier for segment detection, followed by a post-processing method used for event detection. Adopting all the above-mentioned essential aspects, the proposed event detection system achieved 72.63% and 75.34% sensitivity for subject-wise 5-fold and leave-one-out analyses, respectively. This study presents the real-world scenario for ES event detectors and furthers the understanding of such detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.