ArticlePeerJ2024
Association between the metabolic score for insulin resistance and prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study in Xinjiang.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Insulin resistance is associated with the development and progression of various cancers. However, the epidemiological evidence for the association between insulin resistance and prostate cancer is still limited. Objectives: To investigate the associations between insulin resistance and prostate cancer prevalence. Methods: A total of 451 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with prostate cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were selected as the case population; 1,863 participants who conducted physical examinations during the same period were selected as the control population. The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) was calculated as a substitute indicator for evaluating insulin resistance. The Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were performed to compare the basic information of the case population and control population. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to define factors that may influence prostate cancer prevalence. The generalized additive model (GAM) was applied to fit the relationship between METS-IR and prostate cancer. Interaction tests based on generalized additive model (GAM) and contour plots were also carried out to analyze the interaction effect of each factor with METS-IR on prostate cancer. Results: METS-IR as both a continuous and categorical variable suggested that METS-IR was negatively associated with prostate cancer prevalence. Smoothed curves fitted by generalized additive model (GAM) displayed a nonlinear correlation between METS-IR and prostate cancer prevalence ( Conclusions: METS-IR is nonlinearly and negatively associated with the prevalence of prostate cancer. The interaction between METS-IR and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) has an impact on the prevalence of prostate cancer. The study suggests that the causal relationship between insulin resistance and prostate cancer still needs more research to confirm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.