Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076714›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Atrial Arrhythmias Post Catheter Ablation.

Poojesh Nikhil Lallah, Chen Laite, Abdul Basit Bangash, Outesh Chooah, Chenyang Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Poojesh Nikhil LallahDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310016 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chen LaiteDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310016 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Abdul Basit BangashDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310016 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Outesh ChooahDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310016 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Chenyang JiangDepartment of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310016 Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter ablation (CA) is considered as one of the most effective methods technique for eradicating persistent and abnormal cardiac arrhythmias. Nevertheless, in some cases, these arrhythmias are not treated properly, resulting in their recurrences. If left untreated, they may result in complications such as strokes, heart failure, or death. Until recently, the primary techniques for diagnosing recurrent arrhythmias following CA were the findings predisposing to the changes caused by the arrhythmias on cardiac imaging and electrocardiograms during follow-up visits, or if patients reported having palpitations or chest discomfort after the ablation. However, these follow-ups may be time-consuming and costly, and they may not always determine the root cause of the recurrences. With the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI), these follow-up visits can be effectively shortened, and improved methods for predicting the likelihood of recurring arrhythmias after their ablation procedures can be developed. AI can be divided into two categories: machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), the latter of which is a subset of ML. ML and DL models have been used in several studies to demonstrate their ability to predict and identify cardiac arrhythmias using clinical variables, electrophysiological characteristics, and trends extracted from imaging data. AI has proven to be a valuable aid for cardiologists due to its ability to compute massive amounts of data and detect subtle changes in electric signals and cardiac images, which may potentially increase the risk of recurrent arrhythmias after CA. Despite the fact that these studies involving AI have generated promising outcomes comparable to or superior to human intervention, they have primarily focused on atrial fibrillation while atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial tachycardia (AT) were the subjects of relatively few AI studies. Therefore, the aim of this review is to investigate the interaction of AI algorithms, electrophysiological characteristics, imaging data, risk score calculators, and clinical variables in predicting cardiac arrhythmias following an ablation procedure. This review will also discuss the implementation of these algorithms to enable the detection and prediction of AFL and AT recurrences following CA.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceatrial arrhythmiasatrial fibrillationatrial flutteratrial tachycardiacatheter ablationdeep learningmachine learningpost ablation

Identifiers

PMID39076714
PMCPMC11266764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.