Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076701›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

The Impact of Shared Decision-Making on the Quality of Decision Making in Aortic Dissection: A before-and-after Comparison Study.

Duo Zhang, Haoyang Zheng, Zhi Zheng, Youmin Pan, Zhengbiao Zha, Juan Liu, Lisi Zhu, Qiansheng Wu, Kaili Hu, Zelin Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Duo ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Haoyang ZhengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhi ZhengDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sino-Swiss Heart-Lung Transplantation Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Youmin PanDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sino-Swiss Heart-Lung Transplantation Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhengbiao ZhaDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sino-Swiss Heart-Lung Transplantation Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Juan LiuDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lisi ZhuDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Qiansheng WuDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kaili HuDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zelin ChenDepartment of Virology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 565-0871 Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Xiaoxiao WangDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Kan-Paatib Barnabo NampoukimeDivision of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sino-Swiss Heart-Lung Transplantation Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yanrong ZhouDepartment of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430030 Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Complex surgical plans and consideration of risks and benefits often cause decisional conflicts for decision-makers in aortic dissection (AD) surgery, resulting in decision delay. Shared decision-making (SDM) improves decision readiness and reduces decisional conflicts. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of SDM on decision quality in AD. Methods: One hundred and sixty AD decision-makers were divided into two groups: control (n = 80) and intervention (n = 80). The surgical plan for the intervention group was determined using patient decision aids. The primary outcome was decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes included decision preparation, decision satisfaction, surgical method, postoperative complications, actual participation role, and duration of consultation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The decisional conflict score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group ( Conclusions: SDM can reduce decisional conflict, improve decision preparation and satisfaction, and help decision-makers actively participate in the medical management of patients with AD without affecting the medical outcome.

Indexed as

aortic dissectionbefore-and-after comparison studypatient decision aidsshared decision-makingsurgery

Identifiers

PMID39076701
PMCPMC11266772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.