ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024
Chondroprotection of articular cartilage integrity: Utilizing ultrasonic scalpel and hyperosmolar irrigation solution during cutting.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasonic tool to cut human bone: Cutting speed and forces necessary for potential remote robotic arms.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Ultrasonic (US) cutting of cartilage in orthopaedic surgery has received little attention despite its potential to reduce chondrocyte death which could enhance cartilage repair. We aimed to investigate whether an ultrasonically-vibrating scalpel to cut human articular cartilage could reduce chondrocyte death, and to determine if hyper-osmolarity could provide chondroprotection during the procedure. Methods: A scalpel (no. 15) was mounted on an ultrasonic transducer to resonate at 35 kHz with 30 μm vibrational displacement. Thirty-six fresh human femoral cartilage samples were divided into four groups based on ultrasonic activation (US or non-US) and saline osmolarity (300 or 600 mOsm/L). Cell viability was assessed using a live/dead cell assay and analysed quantitatively by confocal microscopy. Histology illustrated tissue surface changes at the cut site. Results: The overall chondrocyte death percentage at both the US and non-US cut sites showed comparable results (p > 0.05) in both osmolarities. However, the zone of chondrocyte death was reduced by 31 ± 5% and 36 ± 6%, respectively, when comparing US cutting at 300 mOsm/L and 600 mOsm/L to the control group (non-US cutting; 300 mOsm/L) (p < 0.05). The width of the cut was consistent at both sites, regardless of the method of cutting. Conclusion: Cutting human cartilage with US in the presence of 300 or 600 mOsm/L media was chondroprotective compared to normal (non-US) scalpel cutting in 300 mOsm/L medium. These results suggest chondroprotection can be achieved while cutting using a US scalpel and raised osmolarity, potentially improving cartilage regeneration and repair following injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.