SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022
Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Assessing Right Ventricular Strain in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between depression and cardiovascular disease in older people: results from a large-scale epidemiological cohort study in Japan.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Are there Disease-Specific Functional Features of Cardiac Mechanics?Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in assessing right ventricular strain via meta-analysis of current literature. Background: Right ventricular strain recorded with CMR serves as a novel indicator to quantify myocardial deformation. Although several studies have reported the predictive value of right ventricular strain determined using CMR, their validity is limited by small sample size and low event number. Methods: Embase, Medline and Web of Science were searched for studies assessing the prognostic value of myocardial strain. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, aborted sudden cardiac death, heart transplantation and heart failure admissions. Results: A total of 14 studies met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis (n = 3239 adults). The random-effects model showed the association of parameters of right ventricular strain with major adverse cardiac events. Absolute value of right ventricular global longitudinal strain was negatively correlated with right ventricular ejection fraction (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.08; Conclusions: Right ventricular strain measured with CMR is an effective prognostic indicator for cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.