Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076649›Full record

SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022

Detecting Left Heart Failure in Echocardiography through Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.

Lies Dina Liastuti, Bambang Budi Siswanto, Renan Sukmawan, Wisnu Jatmiko, Yosilia Nursakina, Rindayu Yusticia Indira Putri, Grafika Jati, Aqsha Azhary Nur

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lies Dina LiastutiDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, 15810 Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bambang Budi SiswantoDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, 15810 Jakarta, Indonesia.
Renan SukmawanDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, 15810 Jakarta, Indonesia.
Wisnu JatmikoDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science Universitas Indonesia, 16424 Depok, Indonesia.
Yosilia NursakinaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, 10430 Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rindayu Yusticia Indira PutriDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital, 15810 Jakarta, Indonesia.
Grafika JatiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science Universitas Indonesia, 16424 Depok, Indonesia.
Aqsha Azhary NurDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, 10430 Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heart failure remains a considerable burden to healthcare in Asia. Early intervention, mainly using echocardiography, to assess cardiac function is crucial. However, due to limited resources and time, the procedure has become more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, studies have shown that artificial intelligence (AI) is highly potential in complementing the work of clinicians to diagnose heart failure accurately and rapidly. Methods: We systematically searched Europe PMC, ProQuest, Science Direct, PubMed, and IEEE following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The 14 selected works of literature were then assessed for their quality and risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies). Results: A total of 2105 studies were retrieved, and 14 were included in the analysis. Five studies posed risks of bias. Nearly all studies included datasets in the form of 3D (three dimensional) or 2D (two dimensional) images, along with apical four-chamber (A4C) and apical two-chamber (A2C) being the most common echocardiography views used. The machine learning algorithm for each study differs, with the convolutional neural network as the most common method used. The accuracy varies from 57% to 99.3%. Conclusions: To conclude, current evidence suggests that the application of AI leads to a better and faster diagnosis of left heart failure through echocardiography. However, the presence of clinicians is still irreplaceable during diagnostic processes and overall clinical care; thus, AI only serves as complementary assistance for clinicians.

Indexed as

echocardiographyheart failuremachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39076649
PMCPMC11270469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.