Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076633›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2022

Current Prostheses for Transcatheter Heart Valve Replacement: A Technical and Clinical Review.

Piotr Nikodem Rudziński, Markus Mach, Christoph Gross, Marco Russo, Paul Werner, Iuliana Coti, Sabine Scherzer, Martin Andreas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Piotr Nikodem RudzińskiDepartment of Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases, National Institute of Cardiology, 04-628 Warsaw, Poland.
Markus MachDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Christoph GrossDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Marco RussoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, 00152 Rome, Italy.
Paul WernerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Iuliana CotiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Sabine ScherzerDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Martin AndreasDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a cornerstone in today's treatment of aortic stenosis. Modern transcatheter prostheses are continuously evolving and each one features different design traits. In this review, the authors provide insight in the technical differences of current prostheses and TAVR related clinical decision pathways, preferably useful for the beginners but also for advanced operators. Additionally, procedural considerations and comparative outcomes of the prostheses are discussed. In doing so, the authors aim to facilitate the choice of the ideal transcatheter valve procedure for each individual.

Indexed as

interventional cardiologytranscatheter aortic valve implantationtranscatheter aortic valve replacementtranscatheter heart valve

Identifiers

PMID39076633
PMCPMC11266972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.