Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076583›Full record

ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2024

Addition of contrast in ultrasound screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Kathryn McGillen, Nabeal Aljabban, Robert Wu, Benjamin Shin, Ian Schreibman, Franklin Luke, James Birkholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathryn McGillenPenn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Nabeal AljabbanPenn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Department of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Robert WuRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Radiology, MEB #404, 1 Robert Wood Johnson Place, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Benjamin ShinGeorge Washington University Hospital, Department of Radiology, 900 23rd St NW 2nd Floor, Washington DC 20037, USA.
Ian SchreibmanPenn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Department of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Franklin LukePenn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
James BirkholzPenn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Department of Radiology, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Screening ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) identifies lesions which require further characterization by a contrast-enhanced exam to non-invasively diagnose HCC. While ultrasound is recommended in screening, some HCC can be occult on grayscale imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of ultrasound contrast (sulfahexafluoride) to screening ultrasound for HCC can identify more HCC lesions than grayscale sonographic imaging alone. Methods: All HCC screening ultrasounds that also had contrast were evaluated in this retrospective study. Patients with a focal lesion seen only after administration of contrast (OAC) were noted, as well as any follow-up imaging or pathology results. Additional variables collected included patient demographics, cirrhosis type, and laboratory values. Results: 230 unique patients were included, of which 160 had imaging or pathology follow-up. 18 of these patients had an OAC lesion, of which 17 had follow-up. Among these OACs, there was one LIRADS M lesion (1/18, 5.6 %) and one bland portal vein thrombus identified, which were both confirmed on follow-up imaging. All LIRADS 4 OAC lesions were downgraded. No additional HCC were identified on follow-up imaging or pathology of these patients. Conclusion: Addition of contrast to screening ultrasound did identify additional lesions, portal vein thrombus, and high grade malignancy. However, as the incidence of OAC lesions was low (7.8 %, 18/230) and most of the lesions were not malignant, addition of post contrast sweeps through the liver is of low value in the low to medium at-risk cirrhotic population in identifying occult HCC.

Indexed as

Contrast-enhanced ultrasoundHepatocellular carcinomaScreening, CirrhosisUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39076583
PMCPMC11265193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.