ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
The Impact of Flow-Mediated Vasodilatation on Mechanism and Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A FMD and OCT Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endothelial dysfunction in plaque rupture and plaque erosion.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endothelial dysfunction, characterized by impaired flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), is associated with atherosclerosis. However, the relationship between FMD, plaque morphology, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the influence of FMD on the morphology of culprit plaques and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with ACS. Methods: This study enrolled 426 of 2482 patients who presented with ACS and subsequently underwent both preintervention FMD and optical coherence tomography (OCT) between May 2020 and July 2022. Impaired FMD was defined as an FMD% less than 7.0%. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) included cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, revascularization, or rehospitalization for angina. Results: Within a one-year follow-up, 34 (8.0%) patients experienced MACEs. The median FMD% was 4.0 (interquartile range 2.6-7.0). Among the patients, 225 (52.8%) were diagnosed with plaque rupture (PR), 161 (37.8%) with plaque erosion (PE), and 25 (5.9%) with calcified nodules (CN). Impaired FMD was found to be associated with plaque rupture (odds ratio [OR] = 4.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.07-6.72, Conclusions: Impaired FMD was observed in three quarters of ACS patients and can serve as a noninvasive predictor of plaque rupture and risk for future adverse cardiac outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.