ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Demographical and Clinical Factors Predictive for Aortic Dilatation. When should we be Concerned about the Size?
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracic aortic aneurysms are often an accidental finding and result from a degenerative process. Medical therapy includes pharmacological control of arterial hypertension and smoking cessation, that slows the growth of aneurysms. An association between the dilatation of the ascending and abdominal aorta has been already reported. The aim of the study was to identify possible demographic and clinical factors that may implicate further imaging diagnostics in patients with ascending aorta dilatation. Methods: There were 181 (93 (53%) males and 88 (47%) females) patients with a median age of 54 (41-62) years who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance due to non-vascular diseases, were enrolled into retrospective analysis. Results: Multivariable analysis revealed ascending aorta dilatation (odds ratios (OR) = 7.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.98-28.0, Conclusions: The results of our analysis showed predictive factors, including ascending aorta dilatation and co-existence of coronary artery disease, particularly over 49 years of age for thoracic, while ascending aorta dilatation and age, particularly over 54 years, for abdominal aorta dilatation. These features may be considered to increase clinical vigilance in patients with aortic diameter abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.