Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076493›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024

Implantable Cardiac Devices in Patients with Brady- and Tachy-Arrhythmias: An Update of the Literature.

William Chick, Christopher Monkhouse, Amal Muthumala, Syed Ahsan, Nikolaos Papageorgiou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William ChickCardiology Department, Lister Hospital, East and North NHS Hertfordshire NHS Trust, SG1 4AB Stevenage, UK.
Christopher MonkhouseElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital London, Barts Health NHS Trust, EC1A 7BE London, UK.
Amal MuthumalaElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital London, Barts Health NHS Trust, EC1A 7BE London, UK.
Syed AhsanElectrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital London, Barts Health NHS Trust, EC1A 7BE London, UK.
Nikolaos PapageorgiouCardiology Department, Lister Hospital, East and North NHS Hertfordshire NHS Trust, SG1 4AB Stevenage, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable cardiac devices are a vital treatment option in the management of tachy/brady-arrhythmias and heart failure with conduction disease. In the recent years, these devices have become increasingly sophisticated, with high implantation success rates and longevity. However, these devices are not without risks and complications, which need to be carefully considered before implantation. In an era of rapidly evolving cardiac device therapies, this review article will provide an update on the literature and outline some of the emerging technologies that aim to maximise the efficiency of implantable devices and reduce complications. We discuss novel pacing techniques, including alternative pacing sites in anti-bradycardia and biventricular pacing, as well as the latest evidence surrounding leadless device technologies and patient selection for implantable device therapies.

Indexed as

brady-arrhythmiacardiac resynchronisation therapyimplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorpacemakertachy-arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID39076493
PMCPMC11267218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.