ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
Review of Techniques for Protecting Side Branch from Occlusion during Provisional Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Stepwise Approach to Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Enhancing Safety and Efficacy With Modified Jailed Balloon Techniques.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Reverse Crush Versus Culotte in Bifurcation Lesions After Provisional Stenting: Insights From the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION Registry.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Drug-Coated Balloons in Side Branch Treatment in True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Predictors and impact for side branch occlusion after bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: insights from multimodal imaging and 2-year clinical outcomes.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Double-Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting for Coronary Bifurcations: A 1-Year Follow-up Study in Vietnam.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Risk factors and clinical consequences of side branch occlusion in left anterior descending bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention: a validation study of the V-RESOLVE score.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Early experience with the "modified jailed balloon technique" for side branch protection in bifurcation lesions.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary bifurcation lesions remain one of the most challenging lesions for cardiology interventionists. The provisional stenting strategy has been regarded as the first option for most of these lesions. However, the main complication of this technique is side branch (SB) occlusion, which could lead to a peri-procedural myocardial infarction or even death. Various studies have focused on addressing this issue, but there are no definitive guidelines in the literature to treat these lesions. There isn't enough clinical evidence from randomized controlled trial or two-arm cohort studies to illustrate which techniques provide the best outcomes. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms, independent predictors and predictive models of SB occlusion, and review seventeen techniques involving SB protection and occlusion rescue. Every technique was evaluated according to related bench tests, clinical studies and our own clinical experiences. The aim of this review is to provide interventionists with new insights for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.