ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
Exploring Disparities in Healthcare Wearable Use among Cardiovascular Patients: Findings from a National Survey.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adherence to Actigraphic Devices in Elementary School-Aged Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Usability and Technology Acceptance of a Wearable Monitoring System Among Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Wearable Devices and Data Sharing in the US.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Implementation Framework to Increase Patient Adherence in Clinical Trials Utilizing Wearable Devices.Research square · 2025Article
- Patient and physician perspectives on smartwatch-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest detection.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and ECG: A New Frontier in Cardiac Diagnostics and Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Psychological Aspects of Wearable Health Technologies in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease: A Literature Review and Call to Action.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Mobile/wearable digital devices for care of active cancer patients: a survey from the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Usage Trends and Data Sharing Practices of Healthcare Wearable Devices Among US Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Digital Disparities in Healthcare: A Tale of the Haves and Have-Nots?Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- The Role of Wearable Devices in Blood Pressure Monitoring and Hypertension Management: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Adoption of Wearable Insulin Biosensors for Diabetes Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Use of healthcare wearable devices holds significant potential for improving the prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, we have limited knowledge on the actual use of wearable devices by CVD patients and the key factors associated with their use. This study aims to assess wearable device use and willingness to share health data among CVD patients, while identifying socio-demographic, health, and technology-related factors associated with wearable technology use. Methods: Using a national survey of 933 CVD patients, we assess use of wearable healthcare devices (use, frequency of use and willingness to share health data from wearable with a provider), and a set of socio-demographic factors (age, gender, race, education and household income), health-related variables (general health, presence of comorbid conditions: diabetes and high blood pressure, attitude towards exercise) and technology self-efficacy using logistic regression. Results: Of the 933 CVD patients, 18.34% reported using a healthcare wearable device in the prior 12 months. Of those, 41.92% indicated using it every day and another 19.76% indicated using it 'almost every day'. 83.54% of wearable users indicated their willingness to share health data with their healthcare providers. Female CVD patients are more likely to use wearables compared to men (odds ratio (OR) = 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-2.63). The odds decrease with age, and are significantly high in patients with higher income levels. In comparison with non-Hispanic White, Hispanic (OR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.03-0.70) and African Americans (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.04-0.86) are less likely to use healthcare wearables. CVD patients who perceive their general health to be better (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.11-1.89) and those who enjoy exercising (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.22-2.55) are more likely to use wearables. CVD patients who use the internet for searching for medical information (OR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.17-3.77) and those who use electronic means to make appointments with their providers (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.48-3.74) are more inclined to use wearables. Conclusions: Addressing low wearable device usage among CVD patients requires targeted policy interventions to ensure equitable access. Variations in gender, age, race/ethnicity, and income levels emphasize the need for tailored strategies. Technological self-efficacy, positive health perceptions, and exercise enjoyment play significant roles in promoting wearable use. These insights should guide healthcare leaders in designing effective strategies for integrating wearables into cardiovascular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.