Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076429›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023

Radiomics Signature of Epicardial Adipose Tissue for Predicting Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Yisen Deng, Zhan Liu, Xuming Wang, Xixi Gao, Zhaohua Zhang, Dingkai Zhang, Mingyuan Xu, Haijie Chen, Xueqiang Fan, Yuguang Yang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yisen DengDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Zhan LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Xuming WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Xixi GaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 100029 Beijing, China.
Zhaohua ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Dingkai ZhangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 100029 Beijing, China.
Mingyuan XuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Haijie ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Xueqiang FanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 100029 Beijing, China.
Yuguang YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 100029 Beijing, China.
Zhidong YeDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, 100029 Beijing, China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.
Jianyan WenDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, 100191 Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative new atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a commonly observed complication after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCABG), and models based on radiomics features of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) on non-enhanced computer tomography (CT) to predict the occurrence of POAF after OPCABG remains unclear. This study aims to establish and validate models based on radiomics signature to predict POAF after OPCABG. Methods: Clinical characteristics, radiomics signature and features of non-enhanced CT images of 96 patients who underwent OPCABG were collected. The participants were divided into a training and a validation cohort randomly, with a ratio of 7:3. Clinical characteristics and EAT CT features with statistical significance in the multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilized to build the clinical model. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to identify significant radiomics features to establish the radiomics model. The combined model was constructed by integrating the clinical and radiomics models. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the clinical model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.761 (95% CI: 0.634-0.888) and 0.797 (95% CI: 0.587-1.000), respectively. The radiomics model showed better discrimination ability than the clinical model, with AUC of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.806-0.961) and 0.891 (95% CI: 0.772-1.000) respectively for the training and the validation cohort. The combined model performed best and exhibited the best predictive ability among the three models, with AUC of 0.922 (95% CI: 0.853-0.990) in the training cohort and 0.913 (95% CI: 0.798-1.000) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve demonstrated strong concordance between the predicted and actual observations in both cohorts. Furthermore, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded Conclusions: The superior performance of the combined model suggests that integrating of clinical characteristics, radiomics signature and features on non-enhanced CT images of EAT may enhance the accuracy of predicting POAF after OPCABG.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcoronary artery bypass surgeryepicardial adipose tissuenon-enhanced CTradiomics

Identifiers

PMID39076429
PMCPMC11272852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.