ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cardiac Arrhythmias.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation and management of recent onset cardiomyopathy in the current era of heart failure therapeutics: a clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Cardiac MRI with metric optimized gating in pediatric patients with ventricular bigeminy.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Hybrid PET/MRI in Inflammatory Cardiac Diseases: A Systematic Review and Single-Center Experience.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) in the Evaluation of Arrhythmia and Cardiomyopathy.Cureus · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction for decision-making.Future cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrhythmias are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and poor quality of life. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, with its unsurpassed capability of non-invasive tissue characterisation, high accuracy, and reproducibility of measurements, plays an integral role in determining the underlying aetiology of cardiac arrhytmias. CMR can reliably diagnose previous myocardial infarction, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, characterise congenital heart disease and valvular pathologies, and also detect the underlying substrate concealed on conventional investigations in a significant proportion of patients with arrhythmias. Determining the underlying substrate of arrhythmia is of paramount importance for treatment planning and prognosis. However, CMR imaging in patients with irregular heart rates can be problematic. Understanding the different ways to overcome the limitations of CMR in arrhythmia is essential for providing high-quality imaging, comprehensive information, and definitive answers in this diverse group of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.