ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2023
Cystatin C to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05174143 (Personalized Antiplatelet Therapy According to CYP2C19 Genotype in Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Antiplatelet Therapy According to CYP2C19 Genotype in Coronary Artery Disease: A Real World Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While both cystatin C and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) revealed established prognostic efficacy in coronary artery disease (CAD), the relationship between cystatin C/left ventricular ejection fraction ratio (CLR) and adverse clinical outcomes among patients with CAD following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains obscure, to date. Therefore, we sought to assess the predictive efficacy of CLR among CAD patients who underwent PCI in current study. Methods: A total of 14,733 participants, including 8622 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and 6111 patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD), were enrolled from a prospective cohort of 15,250 CAD patients who underwent PCI and were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from 2016 to 2021. The primary outcome of this study was mortality, including all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiac mortality (CM). The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (NFMI). For CLR, the optimal cut-off value was determined by utilizing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC). Subsequently, patients were assigned into two groups: a high-CLR group (CLR Results: The high-CLR group had a higher incidence of ACM (8.8% vs. 0.9%), CM (6.7% vs. 0.6%), MACEs (12.7% vs. 5.9%), MACCEs (13.3% vs. 6.7%), and NFMIs (3.3% vs. 0.9%). After adjusting for confounders, multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that patients with high-CLR had an 8.163-fold increased risk of ACM (HR = 10.643, 95% CI: 5.525~20.501, Conclusions: The current study indicated that a high CLR is a novel and powerful predictor of adverse long-term outcomes in CAD patients who underwent PCI, and that, it is a better predictor for patients wtih SCAD and ACS. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05174143, http://Clinicaltrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.