Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076369›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Vocal repertoire and individuality in the plains zebra (

Bing Xie, Virgile Daunay, Troels C Petersen, Elodie F Briefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bing XieBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4947-0703
Virgile DaunayBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1220-4471
Troels C PetersenNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-3037
Elodie F BrieferBehavioural Ecology Group, Section for Ecology and Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-0319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic signals are vital in animal communication, and quantifying them is fundamental for understanding animal behaviour and ecology. Vocalizations can be classified into acoustically and functionally or contextually distinct categories, but establishing these categories can be challenging. Newly developed methods, such as machine learning, can provide solutions for classification tasks. The plains zebra is known for its loud and specific vocalizations, yet limited knowledge exists on the structure and information content of its vocalzations. In this study, we employed both feature-based and spectrogram-based algorithms, incorporating supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods to enhance robustness in categorizing zebra vocalization types. Additionally, we implemented a permuted discriminant function analysis to examine the individual identity information contained in the identified vocalization types. The findings revealed at least four distinct vocalization types-the 'snort', the 'soft snort', the 'squeal' and the 'quagga quagga'-with individual differences observed mostly in snorts, and to a lesser extent in squeals. Analyses based on acoustic features outperformed those based on spectrograms, but each excelled in characterizing different vocalization types. We thus recommend the combined use of these two approaches. This study offers valuable insights into plains zebra vocalization, with implications for future comprehensive explorations in animal communication.

Indexed as

bioacousticssupervised machine learningungulateunsupervised machine learningvocal individualityvocalization type

Identifiers

PMID39076369
PMCPMC11286140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.