Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076350›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

Combining models to generate consensus medium-term projections of hospital admissions, occupancy and deaths relating to COVID-19 in England.

Harrison Manley, Thomas Bayley, Gabriel Danelian, Lucy Burton, Thomas Finnie, Andre Charlett, Nicholas A Watkins, Paul Birrell, Daniela De Angelis, Matt Keeling and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Harrison ManleyUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6970-7671
Thomas BayleyUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Gabriel DanelianUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Lucy BurtonUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Thomas FinnieUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Andre CharlettUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Nicholas A WatkinsUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Paul BirrellUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Daniela De AngelisUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6619-6112
Matt KeelingDepartment of Mathematics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-4765
Sebastian FunkLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-3406
Graham MedleyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lorenzo PellisUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-6487
Marc BaguelinImperial College London, London, UK.
Graeme J AcklandUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1205-7675
Johanna HutchinsonUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Steven RileyUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Jasmina Panovska-GriffithsUK Health Security Agency, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7720-1121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical modelling has played an important role in offering informed advice during the COVID-19 pandemic. In England, a cross government and academia collaboration generated medium-term projections (MTPs) of possible epidemic trajectories over the future 4-6 weeks from a collection of epidemiological models. In this article, we outline this collaborative modelling approach and evaluate the accuracy of the combined and individual model projections against the data over the period November 2021-December 2022 when various Omicron subvariants were spreading across England. Using a number of statistical methods, we quantify the predictive performance of the model projections for both the combined and individual MTPs, by evaluating the point and probabilistic accuracy. Our results illustrate that the combined MTPs, produced from an ensemble of heterogeneous epidemiological models, were a closer fit to the data than the individual models during the periods of epidemic growth or decline, with the 90% confidence intervals widest around the epidemic peaks. We also show that the combined MTPs increase the robustness and reduce the biases associated with a single model projection. Learning from our experience of ensemble modelling during the COVID-19 epidemic, our findings highlight the importance of developing cross-institutional multi-model infectious disease hubs for future outbreak control.

Indexed as

COVID-19 medium-term projections (MTPs)ensemble modellingmodellingSARS-CoV-2statistical modelling

Identifiers

PMID39076350
PMCPMC11285879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.