ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Impact of Pulmonary Ventilation Dysfunction on Prognosis of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center, Observational Study.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) often experience pulmonary ventilation dysfunction following their initial event. However, there is insufficient research exploring the relationship between this dysfunction and CAD prognosis. Methods: To address this gap, a retrospective observational study was conducted involving 3800 CAD patients without prior pulmonary ventilation disease who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during hospitalization between November 2015 and September 2021. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias between the two groups, with a subgroup analysis stratified by smoking status. Results: The results showed that patients were divided into normal (n = 2159) and abnormal (n = 1641) groups based on their pulmonary ventilation function detected by CPET, with 1469 smokers and 2331 non-smokers. The median follow-up duration was 1237 (25-75% interquartile range 695-1596) days. The primary endpoint occurred in 390 patients (10.26%). 1472 patients in each of the two groups were enrolled in the current analysis after PSM, respectively. However, pulmonary function was not associated with MACE before (hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.99-1.47; Log-rank Conclusions: Pulmonary ventilation dysfunction identified through CPET was independently associated with long-term poor prognosis in smoking patients with CAD but not in the overall population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.