ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Assessing the Applicability of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Management in a Large Single Center Cohort.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mavacamten's Dose-Time Dynamics and Predictive Factors in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Cardiac Remodeling.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Correction: Amr et al. Assessing the Applicability of Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Management in a Large Single Center Cohort. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2024; 25(6): 225.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Mavacamten inhibits myosin activity by stabilizing the myosin interacting-heads motif and stalling motor force generation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Real-World Evaluation of Guideline-Directed Treatments in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Germany.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Article
- Targeting the Sarcomere: Myosin Inhibitors as the Revolutionary Game Changer in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Mavacamten in the Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: from Pathophysiology To Real World Data.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Trials and Future Challenges.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Perinatal death in pig models of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy carrying sarcomere pathogenic variants.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), including Mavacamten and Aficamten, have emerged as a groundbreaking treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The results from phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials for both drugs have showed promising outcomes. However, the highly selective patient recruitment for these trials raises questions about the generalizability of the observed positive effects across broader patient populations suffering from HCM. Methods: A retrospective cohort study at University Hospital Heidelberg included 404 HCM patients. Baseline assessments included family history, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and advanced cardiac imaging, to ensure the exclusion of secondary causes of left ventricular hypertrophy. Results: Among the HCM patients evaluated, only a small percentage met the inclusion criteria for recent CMI trials: 10.4% for EXPLORER-HCM and 4.7% for SEQUOIA-HCM. The predominant exclusion factor was the stringent left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient requirement. Conclusions: This study highlights a significant discrepancy between patient demographics in clinical trials and those encountered in routine HCM clinical practice. Despite promising results from the initial randomized clinical trials that led to the approval of Mavacamten, the selected patient population only represents a small part of the HCM patient cohort seen in routine clinics. This study advocates for further expanded randomized clinical trials with broader inclusion criteria to represent diverse primary HCM patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.