Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39076135›Full record

ArticleWestern journal of nursing research2024

Methodologic and Data-Analysis Triangulation in Case Studies: A Scoping Review.

Margarithe Charlotte Schlunegger, Maya Zumstein-Shaha, Rebecca Palm

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Western journal of nursing research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. L-SOLCO Pilot Study: Examining Allostatic Load and Cancer Treatment Disparities.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Article
  6. The Lived Experience of Phonotrauma: Discussions on Identity and Stigma.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margarithe Charlotte SchluneggerDepartment of Health Professions, Applied Research & Development in Nursing, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5410-4951
Maya Zumstein-ShahaDepartment of Health Professions, Applied Research & Development in Nursing, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4253-3123
Rebecca PalmFaculty of Health, School of Nursing Science, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe sought to explore the processes of methodologic and data-analysis triangulation in case studies using the example of research on nurse practitioners in primary health care. DESIGN AND

methodsWe conducted a scoping review within Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, considering studies that defined a case study design and used 2 or more data sources, published in English or German before August 2023. DATA SOURCES: The databases searched were MEDLINE and CINAHL, supplemented with hand searching of relevant nursing journals. We also examined the reference list of all the included studies.

resultsIn total, 63 reports were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, we included 8 articles. Five studies described within-method triangulation, whereas 3 provided information on between/across-method triangulation. No study reported within-method triangulation of 2 or more quantitative data-collection procedures. The data-collection procedures were interviews, observation, documentation/documents, service records, and questionnaires/assessments. The data-analysis triangulation involved various qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Details about comparing or contrasting results from different qualitative and mixed-methods data were lacking.

conclusionsVarious processes for methodologic and data-analysis triangulation are described in this scoping review but lack detail, thus hampering standardization in case study research, potentially affecting research traceability. Triangulation is complicated by terminological confusion. To advance case study research in nursing, authors should reflect critically on the processes of triangulation and employ existing tools, like a protocol or mixed-methods matrix, for transparent reporting. The only existing reporting guideline should be complemented with directions on methodologic and data-analysis triangulation.

Indexed as

Research DesignData AnalysisHumansNursing ResearchPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchcase studiesnurse practitionersprimary health carereviewtriangulation

Identifiers

PMID39076135
PMCPMC11334375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.