ArticleCurrent cancer drug targets2025
Network Pharmacology-based Virtual Screening of Chemical Constituents from
Article in Current cancer drug targets, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Integrated Cellular Computational Pipeline Decodes Luteolin to Design Possible Allosteric CDK1/CYCLIN B1 Inhibitors That Overcome Breast Cancer Stemness.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Chinese chaste tree
methodsThe active ingredients and targets of VN were identified using SwissADME, SwissTargetPrediction, STITCH, IMPPAT database, KNapSAcK database, and literature. The OMIM and GeneCards databases were searched for possible targets related to breast cancer. The PASS online server was used to check the probability of active metabolite (Pa) against breast cancer. To build protein-protein interactions (PPI) networking, the intersection of disease and drug targets was uploaded to the STITCH database. Cytoscape software was used to analyze the topology parameters of networking to identify hub targets. Gene Ontology (GO) was analyzed using Metascape and ShinyGO, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis was performed using the David database and SR plot, and the site of expression and protein domain were studied using FunRich. We employed AutoDockvina, Discovery Studio, and UCSF ChimeraX software and auxiliary tools for molecular docking and analysis. Zincpharmer was used for pharmacophore mapping. ADMET analysis was conducted using ADMETsar, Swiss ADME, ADMETLab servers, and mypresto using GROMACS for molecular dynamics simulation (MDS).
resultsA total of 65 targets and 21 active ingredients were identified. Further investigation was conducted on 20 hub targets selected through PPI networking construction. The enrichment analysis results indicated that the key factors were P, amyloid-beta response, cellular response to amyloid- beta, Pos. reg. of G2/M transition of the mitotic cell cycle, and response to a toxic substance. The molecular docking, pharmacophore mapping, and MD simulation results indicated that apigenin, kaempferol, and luteolin positively interacted with CDK1 and CDK6 proteins.
conclusionThis study is the first to use network pharmacology, molecular docking, pharmacophore mapping, and MD simulation to identify the active ingredients, molecular targets, and critical biological pathways responsible for VN anti-breast cancer. The study provides a theoretical basis for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39075939What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.