Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075871›Full record

ArticleAssessment2025

Portable Touchscreen Assessment of Motor Skill: A Registered Report of the Reliability and Validity of EDNA MoTap.

Thomas B McGuckian, Jade Laracas, Nadine Roseboom, Sophie Eichler, Szymon Kardas, Stefan Piantella, Michael H Cole, Ross Eldridge, Jonathan Duckworth, Bert Steenbergen and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thomas B McGuckianAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5490-0042
Jade LaracasAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Nadine RoseboomAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Sophie EichlerAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Szymon KardasAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Stefan PiantellaAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0122-6979
Michael H ColeAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Ross EldridgeRMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan DuckworthRMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bert SteenbergenRadboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dido GreenBrunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Peter H WilsonAustralian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Portable and flexible administration of manual dexterity assessments is necessary to monitor recovery from brain injury and the effects of interventions across clinic and home settings, especially when in-person testing is not possible or convenient. This paper aims to assess the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a new suite of touchscreen-based manual dexterity tests (called

Indexed as

Motor SkillsAdultFemaleHumansMalePre-Registration PublicationReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultdexterityfinger tappingmotor assessmentrehabilitationreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID39075871
PMCPMC11874617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.