ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025
Practical applications of soil microbiota to improve ecosystem restoration: current knowledge and future directions.
Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactiplantibacillus plantarum as a Biosafe Microbial Bridge in the Gut-Environment Continuum.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Enhanced Endophytic Colonization of Flavobacterium Promotes Plant Resistance to Fusarium Wilt.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Microbial diversity: the essential foundation for life on our planet.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Restoration Plantings Promote Functional Recovery of Soil Fungi.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Contrasting Responses of Rhizosphere Bacterial and Fungal Communities ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- From Mechanisms to Application: A Case-Based Review ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biodiversity and natural capital in ecologically sensitive regions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Host Species Mediate Distinct Seed Microbiome Responses to Restoration.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Wavyleaf basketgrass (mSphere · 2026Article
- Unlocking Grass Stress Resistance: Fungal Endophyte-Mediated Pathogen Recognition and RNA Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Restoring soil and sediment microbiomes in the Anthropocene.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Urban forest restoration enhances soil microbial functional potential and functional insurance via shifts in β-diversity.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Microorganism-Based Biological Products for Agriculture: From Strain Selection to Production Organization.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Soil Microbial Functions Indicate Persistent Agricultural Legacies and Potential Alternative States Following Restoration Plantings.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Recovery of organic waste from a wastewater treatment plant, improved with plant growth promoting bacteria: model ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Harnessing plant microbiomes to enhance crop resilience and restore war-affected soils in Ukraine.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- From microbiome collapse to recovery: a roadmap for microbiome-informed grassland restoration under global change.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Mapping and Cataloguing Microbial and Biochemical Determinants of Health: Towards a 'Database of Salutogenic Potential'.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Article
- Arid Soil Bacterial Legacies Improve Drought Resilience of the Keystone Grass, Themeda triandra.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Shifting community assembly mechanisms in soil eukaryotes over successional time and their implications for restoration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil microbiota are important components of healthy ecosystems. Greater consideration of soil microbiota in the restoration of biodiverse, functional, and resilient ecosystems is required to address the twin global crises of biodiversity decline and climate change. In this review, we discuss available and emerging practical applications of soil microbiota into (i) restoration planning, (ii) direct interventions for shaping soil biodiversity, and (iii) strategies for monitoring and predicting restoration trajectories. We show how better planning of restoration activities to account for soil microbiota can help improve progress towards restoration targets. We show how planning to embed soil microbiota experiments into restoration projects will permit a more rigorous assessment of the effectiveness of different restoration methods, especially when complemented by statistical modelling approaches that capitalise on existing data sets to improve causal understandings and prioritise research strategies where appropriate. In addition to recovering belowground microbiota, restoration strategies that include soil microbiota can improve the resilience of whole ecosystems. Fundamentally, restoration planning should identify appropriate reference target ecosystem attributes and - from the perspective of soil microbiota - comprehensibly consider potential physical, chemical and biological influences on recovery. We identify that inoculating ecologically appropriate soil microbiota into degraded environments can support a range of restoration interventions (e.g. targeted, broad-spectrum and cultured inoculations) with promising results. Such inoculations however are currently underutilised and knowledge gaps persist surrounding successful establishment in light of community dynamics, including priority effects and community coalescence. We show how the ecological trajectories of restoration sites can be assessed by characterising microbial diversity, composition, and functions in the soil. Ultimately, we highlight practical ways to apply the soil microbiota toolbox across the planning, intervention, and monitoring stages of ecosystem restoration and address persistent open questions at each stage. With continued collaborations between researchers and practitioners to address knowledge gaps, these approaches can improve current restoration practices and ecological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.